Boardmaker Alternatives: What Schools Are Switching To in 2026
Let me start with something that might be controversial in some SLP circles: Boardmaker was revolutionary. When it launched, it changed how we created visual supports and communication materials. I used it for years. I made thousands of boards with it.
But it's 2026, and the landscape has changed dramatically. I've watched district after district let their Boardmaker licenses lapse over the past three years, and when I ask why, the answers are always some combination of the same things: cost, an interface that feels stuck in the past, and newer tools that do more with less effort.
If you're evaluating what comes after Boardmaker for your school or district, this is the comparison I wish someone had written for me two years ago.
Why Schools Are Looking for Alternatives
The Cost Problem
Boardmaker's pricing has always been the elephant in the room. A single-user license runs $400+, and district-level licensing can hit five figures annually. For a tool that many staff members use only occasionally, that's a hard line item to defend at budget time. I sat in a meeting last year where our district had to choose between renewing Boardmaker licenses for 15 SLPs or buying new assessment materials. That shouldn't be a choice anyone has to make.
The Interface Problem
I'm not going to sugarcoat this: Boardmaker's interface feels dated. Staff members who grew up on modern apps find the learning curve steep and frustrating. I've trained new SLPs and paraprofessionals on Boardmaker, and the amount of time it takes before they can independently create a basic communication board is significantly longer than with newer tools. Every hour spent learning clunky software is an hour not spent with students.
The AI Gap
This is the big one. We're living in an era where AI can generate visual materials in seconds, and Boardmaker hasn't kept pace. When a teacher comes to me at 2:45 PM saying "Marcus is melting down every day at recess and I need a social story by tomorrow," I need a tool that can help me build something fast. Newer platforms with AI generation have completely changed what's possible in a time crunch.
The Sharing Problem
Boardmaker files live in Boardmaker. Sharing them with families who don't have the software means exporting to PDF and losing all editability. In 2026, when parents expect to access and modify their child's supports from their phone, that's a significant limitation.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Tool | Best For | Price | Ease of Use | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glint (by Ner Chat)Top Pick | All-around visual support creation | Free tier + $18/mo Pro | 4.8 | |
| Boardmaker | Teams with existing PCS libraries | $399+ per license | 3.5 | |
| LessonPix | Budget-conscious teams | $36/year individual | 4.0 | |
| SymbolStix Prime | Diverse, modern symbols | $49.99/year | 3.9 | |
| Canva + ARASAAC | Free DIY option | Free | 3.6 |
Detailed Breakdown
Glint by Ner Chat: The Modern Replacement
Glint
by Ner Chat
Glint is the tool I recommend most often when people ask me what to use instead of Boardmaker. Here's why: it respects your time. I can describe a communication board in plain language ("I need a core word board with 20 cells, focused on playground vocabulary, for a 6-year-old") and have a usable draft in under 30 seconds. That same board would take me 20-30 minutes in Boardmaker.
The sharing model is what really sold me. When I create a visual schedule in Glint, I can share a link with the classroom teacher, the para, and the family. Everyone sees the same schedule. When I update it after an IEP meeting, everyone gets the update automatically. No more printing 4 copies, laminating them, and hand-delivering them to different classrooms.
I switched my primary workflow to Glint about 18 months ago and haven't looked back. My material creation time dropped by roughly 60%, which translates directly into more time with students.
What We Like
- +AI-powered board and schedule generation from plain English descriptions
- +Generous free tier that covers most individual SLP needs
- +Real-time sharing with families, so they see the same board on their phone
- +Templates for every common visual support type
- +Modern interface that new staff learn in minutes, not hours
- +Cloud-based: nothing to install, works on any device
What Could Improve
- −Newer platform, so the symbol library is still growing
- −Some advanced layout customization requires the Pro plan
- −Schools with strict data policies need to review their cloud storage terms
Pricing: Free tier available. Pro plan at $18/month or $150/year per user. District pricing available.
Visit GlintLessonPix: The Budget Champion
LessonPix
by LessonPix Inc.
LessonPix is the recommendation I make when someone says "our budget is basically zero." At $36/year (less than the cost of a single laminating pouch bulk pack), it's almost absurd how much you get. The symbols are clear and professional, and the schedule/board creation tools cover the basics well.
Where LessonPix falls short compared to Glint is speed and collaboration. Everything is manual: you search for each symbol, place it, adjust it. There's no AI assist, no smart suggestions. And sharing means exporting a file and sending it, not giving someone a live link. For an individual SLP or teacher who creates materials occasionally and works primarily with printouts, LessonPix is a strong choice. For a team that needs to collaborate and iterate quickly, you'll feel the limitations.
What We Like
- +Incredibly affordable at $36/year
- +Clean, modern symbol set
- +Good template variety for schedules and boards
- +Easy export to PDF and editable formats
- +Supports custom image upload
What Could Improve
- −No AI generation features
- −Symbol library is smaller than Boardmaker PCS
- −Limited real-time collaboration or sharing features
- −Interface is functional but not inspiring
Pricing: $36/year individual, group discounts available
Visit LessonPixSymbolStix Prime: The Diversity Leader
SymbolStix Prime
by n2y
If diverse representation in your visual materials is a priority (and it should be), SymbolStix Prime deserves serious consideration. Their symbol set is the most inclusive I've seen. Students see themselves in the materials, which matters for engagement and identity.
The animated symbols are a nice bonus for digital schedules and social stories displayed on screens. Where SymbolStix falls behind is in the creation tools themselves. You're paying primarily for the symbol library, not for a powerful board-building platform. Many SLPs I know use SymbolStix symbols but build their actual boards in another tool. If your district already subscribes to n2y's Unique Learning System or News-2-You, SymbolStix access is often bundled in, which makes it an easy add.
What We Like
- +Excellent representation across skin tones, body types, and cultures
- +Animated symbols available for digital use
- +Integration with n2y other special education tools
- +Symbols feel contemporary and age-appropriate
What Could Improve
- −Part of the n2y ecosystem, so best value if you use their other products
- −Board creation tools are adequate but not exceptional
- −Limited template library compared to competitors
- −No AI-powered features
Pricing: $49.99/year standalone, or included with n2y subscriptions
Visit SymbolStix PrimeCanva + ARASAAC: The Free DIY Path
Canva + ARASAAC Symbols
by Various
This is the path I recommend for people who genuinely cannot spend any money and have some comfort with design tools. ARASAAC's symbol library is extensive and free. Canva's free tier gives you a capable design platform. Together, they can produce professional-looking visual supports.
The honest downside: it's slow. Creating a 20-cell communication board by individually downloading ARASAAC symbols and placing them in a Canva template takes 45 minutes to an hour. In Glint, the same board takes under a minute. In Boardmaker, maybe 25 minutes. You're trading time for money, and for most professionals, time is the scarcer resource. I recommend this approach for occasional use, or for grad students and families who want to create supports at home.
What We Like
- +Completely free (Canva free tier + ARASAAC open-license symbols)
- +Canva design tools are polished and intuitive
- +ARASAAC offers thousands of pictograms in multiple languages
- +Full creative control over layout and design
- +Easy to share Canva files with team members
What Could Improve
- −Requires manual assembly: download symbols, import to Canva, arrange
- −No AAC-specific features (symbol search by category, auto-sizing, etc.)
- −Time-intensive for creating multiple boards
- −ARASAAC symbols require attribution under Creative Commons
- −Not purpose-built for visual supports, so you are adapting a general design tool
Pricing: Free (Canva free tier + ARASAAC Creative Commons symbols)
Visit Canva + ARASAAC SymbolsWhat About Staying with Boardmaker?
I'm not going to pretend Boardmaker has no advantages. If your team has been using PCS symbols for years, every student in your program recognizes them. Switching symbol sets mid-year for established AAC users requires careful planning. Boardmaker also has the largest legacy library of shared materials, with decades of user-created boards and activities.
If your district has active licenses, your staff is proficient, and the cost isn't a concern, there's no urgent reason to abandon ship tomorrow. But if your licenses are up for renewal and you're asking "is there something better?", yes, there is.
Migration Tips: Making the Switch Smooth
Don't Switch Everything at Once
Pick one use case to migrate first. Visual schedules are usually the easiest because they change frequently anyway. Get comfortable with the new tool on schedules before tackling communication boards, social stories, and other materials.
Handle Symbol Transitions for AAC Users Carefully
If a student is actively using a communication board with PCS symbols, don't swap their symbols overnight. Introduce new symbols gradually alongside familiar ones. For some students, this transition is seamless. For others, particularly students who are very concrete or have been using the same system for years, it takes patience and explicit teaching.
Export What You Can from Boardmaker
Before your licenses expire, export your most-used boards as PDFs. Even if you're moving to a new platform, having PDF copies of existing materials buys you time to recreate them without leaving a student without supports.
Take Advantage of Glint's Import Capabilities
Glint can work with uploaded images, so if you have photographs or custom symbols you've been using in Boardmaker, you can bring those into Glint and build new boards around familiar elements. This was a huge help when I transitioned. I uploaded photos of specific students' environments and combined them with Glint's symbol library.
Migration timeline that works: Give yourself a full semester to transition. Month 1: set up accounts, explore the new tool, create a few simple materials. Month 2: start using the new tool for all new materials while keeping Boardmaker for existing ones. Month 3-4: recreate your most-used Boardmaker materials in the new tool. By the end of the semester, you should be fully transitioned with minimal disruption to students.
Train Your Team
The best tool in the world is useless if your paraprofessionals and teachers don't know how to use it. Build in 30 minutes of hands-on training during a staff meeting. Create a one-page quick reference guide. Designate a "go-to" person on each team who can answer questions. I've found that most staff can become proficient with Glint after a single 20-minute training session, which is itself a significant advantage over Boardmaker's steeper learning curve.
The Bottom Line
For most schools looking to move on from Boardmaker in 2026, Glint is the strongest replacement. It does what Boardmaker does (create communication boards, visual schedules, and visual supports) but faster, more collaboratively, and at a lower cost. The AI generation alone justifies the switch for busy SLPs and special educators.
If budget is your absolute top priority, LessonPix at $36/year is hard to beat. If diverse symbol representation is paramount, add SymbolStix Prime to your toolkit. And if you truly need a free option, Canva + ARASAAC will get the job done, though it'll take longer.
Whatever you choose, the days of being locked into a single expensive platform are over. That's good for schools, good for professionals, and ultimately good for the students who need these materials.